Open Letter on Health Care Reform

The following is an open letter to my fellow Americans, and to our representatives in both houses of the legislature. I have sent this to my congresspersons and senators individually, and I post it here for the benefit of my readers. It is distributed under a Creative Commons 1license, so feel free to use it or pass it on with attribution2.

The rallying cry for so-called health care "reform" goes something like this: Think of the uninsured! Think of the small businesses! Think of the single mothers! Think of the children! Anything must be better than what we have. This is effective only as long as we blindly accept that anything is better, making it pointless to evaluate what is really being offered.

As an uninsured, small business employed, single mother concerned for the health and well-being of her six-year-old child, I feel compelled to tell the side of the story being most ignored -- that of the people this legislation promises to help. The uninsured in America face a number of challenges in obtaining adequate health care -- to these natural barriers, proponents of health care "reform" seek to add punitive taxes on those who cannot afford or do not want what the government thinks is the "right" health insurance, and unprecedented government control over how and when care is provided. These proposed changes evidence a despicable assault on poor and working-class Americans by their own public servants, obfuscated in thousand-page policy tracts not fully understood by even their sponsors.

I face the following barriers to obtaining adequate health care: the unpredictability of health care needs; caregivers loathe to lay out for patients exactly what a diagnostic, consultation, or treatment will cost; the prohibitive cost3 of comprehensive no-deductible health insurance -- the all-encompassing type "reformers" are pushing; and the fact that even comprehensive coverage will not cover all of our care needs, such as ongoing supplemental speech therapy for my son.

Ironically, until the "reform" debate began, I thought that my only choice was between impossibly expensive comprehensive insurance or nothing. I almost bought the "health care crisis" FUD4. However, with a little research, I learned that there were already alternatives that I could make work for my family. I'll be putting about $250 per month aside for health care expenses. About $120 of that will pay for high-deductible health insurance -- the kind that kicks in if some injury or illness drives up high medical bills, provides vaccinations and annual check-ups, and gives me $20k of life insurance. The other $130/month goes into a tax-free Health Savings Account, or HSA.

The HSA money pays for any health care expenses I choose to use it on -- it's my money. No one can tell me which doctors to spend it with, or tell my doctor what treatments he or she may prescribe. I can reap the financial benefits of seeing a nurse practitioner instead of a doctor for my strep test, and no one at all for a cold. I can go straight to my specialist if my allergies suddenly effect me differently. *I* get to decide whether the cost savings of glasses is preferable to the quality of life gains of corrective surgery, or not. I'm more motivated to spend the money to take martial arts classes because I know that getting back in shape will save me money on health care -- if I don't stick with it, I'll pay for that, too.

Yes, $250/month is a lot for me right now -- however it is less than any version of "reform" I've seen will cost me, and I get to decide how most of that money will be spent. True, wealthier people will have better health care than I will. That will be true no matter what -- just like wealthy Canadians come to the US to get health care their state-run system won't buy them, wealthy Americans will always be able to buy the best, here or abroad. I'm okay with that. I don't want to get everyone worse care because I don't have the best -- I want to get my family better care!

Proponents of "reform" plans insist that the government doesn't want to control health care. I can't figure out whether they are lying or just impossibly naive. Already Medicare and Medicaid have forced an electronic prescription database on health care providers -- and I got stuck with it. I work in computers, I know exactly how insecure such a system is, and I do not want my information on it. However, because the federal government required it of any provider wishing to see Medicare or Medicaid payments, no provider could afford not to use it.

Would we prefer that our health care costs skyrocket to cover the costs of people who choose to use heroine, the helicopter mom who takes all three kids to a pediatrician every time one of them sniffles or scratches, and the consequences of a poorly performed sex change operation, or would we instead be told that we won't receive care for a broken arm because it was sustained during the "risky" act of backpacking Mt. Ranier with the family, a daughter's birth won't be covered because her mother chose a non-standard birthing position, and a son's speech therapy won't be covered because he needs more of it than they can afford to cover for everyone? Either the government doesn't ration care and regulate our lifestyles, causing taxes and the deficit to explode as consequence-free health care costs spin out of control, or government does ration care, and underpaid bureaucrats take over life, death, and quality of life choices that we should be free to make for ourselves. Ration, don't ration -- either way, we all lose.

The next time someone tells you to think of the uninsured, the small businesses, the single mothers, and the children, think about my family. Ask the "reform" pushers how punishing those with no health insurance, or the "wrong" health insurance gives Americans better health care. Ask how wresting control from all Americans and giving it to the government gives us more choices. Ask whether they want you to pay for others' habits, or let the government decide who gets care. Ask if there is a single "reform" plan they are committed to, and see if they try to avoid analysis of their offering by saying that one bill hasn't been chosen yet. Ask whether they have read whichever health care bill they advocate cover to cover -- and what is in it.

Demand answers, and watch as their arguments crumble, leaving only the false assumption that anything at all is better, and empty appeals to guilt and fear. The health care "reform" argument just doesn't stand up to reason.

  1. 1. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/us/ or send a letter to Creative Commons, 171 Second Street, Suite 300, San Francisco, California, 94105, USA.
  2. 2. Please acknowledge my work with my name, Susan Stewart, and a link to this article.
  3. 3. about 1/3 of my income to cover my son and I
  4. 4. Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt -- seeded to provoke an emotional response and avoid reasoned argument.
AttachmentSize
health_care_reform_letter.pdf40.32 KB

Comments

I think that we should go to a voucher system. All Americans would get a default policy that is provided by the government, but would be able to choose a different policy if they wanted to. The would not be able to opt out of the system entirely, but they could use their voucher to purchase a different policy. They could add money to the voucher if they wanted a better plan than the voucher would get them. Until and unless we are willing to ban people who cannot pay from your hospitals, we have a stake in everyone's decision to have or not have health insurance. Also, when people get sick and retire and/or die early it affects our economy. It also affects how they raise the next generation. More sick parents equals more screwed up children. You Shouldn't have to marry for health insurance or move to Finland unless you want to.
And what if something unconceivable happens and your kid gets a bad condition like leukemia? Here in Finland, we pay high taxes but after that, we are entirely covered. When your kid falls sick, do you have the strength and wisdom to do the right decisions on competitive market? Maybe you do but not all people. I like our national health insurance system. It covers everything from small cough to brain tumours. Rich people can buy additional insurances from private sector too. Rich people will always have choice in the markets, and poor people always grab what they can afford. Competitive private health care markets require good amount of intelligence and literacy from the consumer. Unfortunately not all Americans share these traits. Typical American attitude seems to be "my healthcare is working for me, so it must work for everybody". And "American healthcare is the best in the world" meaning for those who can pay. You also like to demonize European and Canadian healthcare, while most of you have never experienced it first hand. Another typical American attitude is that "Poor people are poor because they are lazy and stupid." Just work harder and all problems are solved. It is of course all true to a certain extent, like all good propaganda. All systems have their caveats, inluding ours. However: Sickness is the number 1 reason for personal bankruptcy in the USA. Middle income American families file bankruptcy because of cancer. This never happens in Europe. As long as United States healthcare is controlled by powerful lobbies and private capital, it will probably never be fixed.
Member since:
17 September 2009
Last activity:
1 year 4 weeks
And what if something unconceivable happens and your kid gets a bad condition like leukemia? Here in Finland, we pay high taxes but after that, we are entirely covered. When your kid falls sick, do you have the strength and wisdom to do the right decisions on competitive market? Maybe you do but not all people.
As I mentioned in my letter, in the case of a health catastrophe such as cancer, or anything that pushes our health care expenses over the deductable, this insurance will pay *all* of our expenses. There are no copays or additional costs after the deductible. I'll happily provide instructions for anyone who can't figure this out themselves. All I did was some internet comparison shopping -- it's not hard. *Anyone* can do it.
I like our national health insurance system. It covers everything from small cough to brain tumours. Rich people can buy additional insurances from private sector too. Rich people will always have choice in the markets, and poor people always grab what they can afford.
Unless you are suggesting that the US should emulate the Finnish system, I fail to see the relevance of this point. I don't want to run to a doctor every time I have a small cough, so I shouldn't have to pay for that coverage. I do want treatment in the event of a brain tumor, so I am buying that. It is my choice. I'm glad you like Finland's system. I don't accept the premise that every state -- let alone every nation -- has to do things the same way in order to be "right". We have very different populations with different needs. To cite just a few examples, the AP recently reported that in August, Finland's Unemployment rate was 7.6%. However, the US unemployment rate for the same month was 9.7%, and in some states is over 15%. According to the EMCDDA, less than half a percent of Finnish people are "problem drug users" (about 0.48 person per 1,000). However, according to the CDC, about 8.3% of Americans 12 and over have used illicit drugs in the past month. Also, Finland is much smaller than the US and its population far less varied.
Competitive private health care markets require good amount of intelligence and literacy from the consumer. Unfortunately not all Americans share these traits.
I'm not buying the argument that a significant number of Americans are so stupid that they need their government to make such important choices for them. American consumers choose their own auto insurance, homeowner's insurance, doctors, and so on every day. Why not health insurance? What evidence have we that the US government can do a better job?
Typical American attitude seems to be "my healthcare is working for me, so it must work for everybody". And "American healthcare is the best in the world" meaning for those who can pay.You also like to demonize European and Canadian healthcare, while most of you have never experienced it first hand. Another typical American attitude is that "Poor people are poor because they are lazy and stupid." Just work harder and all problems are solved. It is of course all true to a certain extent, like all good propaganda. All systems have their caveats, inluding[sic] ours.
Can you please quote the statement or statements in which you think I expressed those attitudes? None of this addresses my position, and you haven't cited anyone else as holding this position. Erecting a straw man is just another way to avoid the argument at hand.
However: Sickness is the number 1 reason for personal bankruptcy in the USA. Middle income American families file bankruptcy because of cancer. This never happens in Europe. As long as United States healthcare is controlled by powerful lobbies and private capital, it will probably never be fixed.
No governmental system can put an end to bad luck, and many of history's worst laws have come from arrogant politicians who believed that they could somehow, with a wave of their legislative wand, make life fair. Some people do file bankruptcy over health costs they couldn't cover, and the bankruptcy process exists to help people get back on their feet after a catastrophic financial loss from which they could not otherwise recover. The system is working. Who do you think owns that private capital? It is distributed among billions of individuals across the country. No one government or agency controls the whole system this way. Do you think that powerful lobbies don't control the government? How much more powerful will they be when they need only lobby one government rather than billions of individual consumers of health care?
Member since:
18 September 2009
Last activity:
1 year 32 weeks
I'm not buying the argument that a significant number of Americans are so stupid that they need their government to make such important choices for them. American consumers choose their own auto insurance, homeowner's insurance, doctors, and so on every day. Why not health insurance?
Americans fail at these amazingly mindnumbingly simple tasks every day. The problem is that they are ignorant. This is in no way an oversight of proper governance. I know this because the government pays for everyone to have at least a highschool education including both home and macro economics, and if these people are still ignorant, paying for free health care as well isn't going to help where the free education already failed so epically. The government is not the salve for ignorance in all it's many forms. It's also been said (though I cannot attribute it) that when you eliminate folly from the world you fill it with fools. I for one am against socialized medicine, and I'd like to remove a few warnings labels while we're at it to see if we can get some stupid people to die grievious but entertaining deaths. (darwinawards has to make it's money somehow)
It's not about reforming health care, it's about the new pork barrel buffet in DC.
Pork barrel buffets are new?!?